Rose In June Latest

[badger]

Originally Posted by leeway

Just because an offer has been made will not change a thing unless the offer is near to the asking price.

I'm not sure about that, lw. In the earlier application the agents made a big deal of having made substantial efforts to market it as a pub - these efforts in reality boiled down to putting up the rent asked by a huge amount (I think it was about 45%), having it hidden, unavailable or difficult to find on their website for long periods, and then asking a purchase price way out of line with other pub sites in the area. An image of forked tongues springs to mind.

A real offer which is in line with current pub prices rather than the vendors' housing-inflated ambitions could wipe out their argument for planning change of use.

[Owd Rooter]

Originally Posted by badger

A real offer which is in line with current pub prices rather than the vendors' housing-inflated ambitions could wipe out their argument for planning change of use.

I wonder how the amount currently being offered for the Rose in June, compares with what is actually being paid for comparable pubs marketed as 'going concerns', elsewhere in Hampshire and W.Sussex?

[Furbag]

Originally Posted by Owd Rooter

I wonder how the amount currently being offered for the Rose in June, compares with what is actually being paid for comparable pubs marketed as 'going concerns', elsewhere in Hampshire and W.Sussex?

Depends but it dosnt look like it that much looking at THESE

Although thats from all over the country but they do appear to be going quite cheap these day

Fur

[haylingpete]

Just done my 'online' objection to the application to demolish the barn.

It is part of Haylings heritage, there is not that much 'heritage/character' left on the Island, all efforts must be made to retain what little we have.

Hp

[paul]

Originally Posted by haylingpete

Just done my 'online' objection to the application to demolish the barn.

It is part of Haylings heritage, there is not that much 'heritage/character' left on the Island, all efforts must be made to retain what little we have.

Hp

I second that

[rubberkipper]

Originally Posted by haylingpete

Just done my 'online' objection to the application to demolish the barn.

It is part of Haylings heritage, there is not that much 'heritage/character' left on the Island, all efforts must be made to retain what little we have.

Hp

You are a bit late with your objection Pete. Someone decided to take barn demolition into their own hands. Which begs the question why, on earth, would you want to preserve that new mess?

If you're into piles of unrecognisible and disjointed timbers then I hear the Mary Rose exhibition is worth the trip

[haylingpete]

Originally Posted by rubberkipper

You are a bit late with your objection Pete. Someone decided to take barn demolition into their own hands.

yeah I know, I posted the photographs.

Originally Posted by rubishkippre

Which begs the question why, on earth, would you want to preserve that new mess?

They have these clever guys nowadays, who restore & rebuild things, a bit like the barn round Northney, opposite the 3 storey pads.
The barn should be rebuilt, which is what I included in my objection.
If you want to see more pop over to the Weald & Down Land.


Hp

It was reported this evening that another pub is for sale on the Island. I am worried that too many of our pubs may be lost.

Any comments Bruce?

[smeagal]

Originally Posted by haylingpete

yeah I know, I posted the photographs.



They have these clever guys nowadays, who restore & rebuild things, a bit like the barn round Northney, opposite the 3 storey pads.
The barn should be rebuilt, which is what I included in my objection.
If you want to see more pop over to the Weald & Down Land.


Hp

According to English Heritage the barn is not destroyed as the foundations are still intact so the barn can be rebuilt. AND SHOULD BE.

[haysboat]

Was there a meeting tonight about the RIJ?